Safety of cerebral digital subtraction angiography : complication rate analysis

Main Article Content

Fritz Sumantri Usman
Achmad Firdaus Sani
Shakir Husain

Abstract

Background
Cerebral digital subtraction angiography (DSA) continues to be used for the examination of patients with cerebrovascular diseases. In the past decade, safer contrast agents have been used and there have been important technical advances including smaller catheters, hydrophylic guide wires, and digital imaging systems. The objective of this study was to determine the neurological complication rates of cerebral angiography performed for inpatients.

Methods
A prospective study was conducted from January 2009 until December 2011. The patient’s demographic characteristics, the procedural details as well as complications appearing during and after the procedure were documented. Neurological complications are classified based on the international classification: (a) transient, disappearing within 24 hours; (b) reversible, lasting more than 24 hours but less than 7 days; (c) permanent, if the complication last for more than 7 days. The complications were examined by a neurologist.

Results
The patients comprised 82 (41%) women and 118 (59%) men, ranging from 11 to 86 years of age. From 200 patients who underwent the procedure, permanent neurological complications were found in 1 (0.50 %) patient. Neither reversible nor transient neurological complications were found.

Conclusion
The cerebral digital subtraction angiography procedure, when conducted by a neuro interventionist, is relatively save, both from the aspect of neurological and non-neurological complications, and from the number of deaths. The overall neurological complication rate fell within the limits recommended by quality improvement and safe practice guidelines.

Article Details

How to Cite
Usman, F. S., Sani, A. F., & Husain, S. (2012). Safety of cerebral digital subtraction angiography : complication rate analysis. Universa Medicina, 31(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.18051/UnivMed.2012.v31.27-33
Section
Review Article

References

Okahara M, Kiyosue H, Yamashita M, Nagatomi H, Hata H, Saginoya T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for cerebral aneurysms in correlation with 3D-digital subtraction angiographic images: a study of 133 aneurysms. Stroke 2002;33:1803-8.

van Rooij WJ, Sprengers ME, de Gast AN. 3D-rotational angiography: the new gold standard in the detection of additional intracranial aneurysms. Am J Neuradiol 2008;29:976 –9.

Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, Terbrugge K, Farb RI, Omlinson G, Montanera W. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003;227: 522–8.

Morris P. Performing a cerebral or spinal arteriogram. In: Practical neuroangiography. New York: Lippicott William & Wilkins;2007.

Johnston DC, Champman KM, Goldstein LB. Low rate of complications of cerebral angiographin routine clinical practice. Neurology 2001;57:2012-4.

Guo Y, Piza M, Rubin GL, Dorsch N, Young N,Wong KP. Neurological complication of cerebral angiography performed for hospital inpatients. J HK Coll Radiol 2007;10:9-15.

Nguyen-Huynh MN, Wintermark M, English J, Lam J, Vittinghoff E, Smith WS, et al. How accurate is CT angiography in evaluating intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Stroke 2008; 39:1184-8.

Latchaw RE, Alberts MJ, Lev MH, Connors JJ, Harbaugh RE, Higashida RT, et al. Recommendations for imaging of acute ischemic stroke: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 2009;40:3646-78.

Dankbaar JW, de Rooij NK, Rijsdijk M, Velthuis BK, Frijns CJM, Rinkel GJE, et al. Diagnostic threshold values of cerebral perfusion measured with computed tomography for delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 2010;41:1927-32.

Gounis MJ, De Leo MJ, Wakhloo AK. Advances in interventional neuroradiology. Stroke 2010; 41:e80-e7.

Kaufmann TJ, Houston J, Mandrekaar JN. Complication of diagnostic cerebral angiography: evaluation of 19,826 consecutive patients. Radiology 2007;3:812-9.

Jurga J, Nyman J, Tornvall P, Mannila MN, Svenarud P, van der Linden J, et al. Cerebral microembolism during coronary angiography: a randomized comparison between femoral and radial arterial access. Stroke 2011;42:1475-7.

Kwon OK, Oh CW, Park H. Is fasting necessary for elective cerebral angiography?. Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:908-10.

Madrid MM, Barret EA, Winstead Fry P. A study of the feasibility of introducing therapeutic touch tnto the operative environment with patients undergoing cerebral angiography. J Holist Nurs 2010;28:168-74.

Amarenco P, Lavallée PC, Labreuche J, Ducrocq G, Juliard JM, Feldman L, et al. Prevalence of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with cerebral infarction. Stroke 2011;42:22–9.

Kelly ME, Furlan AJ, Fiorella D. Recanalization of an acute middle cerebral artery occlusion using a self-expanding, reconstrainable, intracranial microstent as a temporary endovascular bypass. Stroke 2008;39:1770-3.

Short JL Majid A, Hussain SI. Endovascular treatment of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic desease. Front Neurol 2011;1:1-8. doi:10.3389/fneur.2010.00160.

Nguyen TN, Babikian VL, Romero L, Pikula A, Kase CS, Jovin TG. Intra arterial treatment methods in acute ischaemic stroke. Front Neurol 2011;2:1-10. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2011.00009.

Connors JJ, Sacks D, Furlan AJ. For the NeuroVascular Coalition Writing Group. Training, competency, and credentialing standards for diagnostic cervicocerebral angiography, carotid stenting, and cerebrovascular intervention. AJNR 2004;25: 1732-41.

Thaker NG, Turner JD, Cobb WS, Hussain I, Janjua N, He W, et al. Computed tomographic angiography versus digital subtraction angiography for the postoperative detection of residual aneurysms: a single-institution series and meta-analysis. J NeuroIntervent Surg 2012; 4:219-225. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010025.