Evaluation of factors affecting success rate of open nephrolithotomy in adult patients

Main Article Content

Fauriski Febrian Prapiska
Ahmad Ma'ruf Muttaqin Aminanto
Andri Kusuma Harmaya

Abstract

Background
Indonesia has a high incidence of kidney stone disease. Endoscopic procedures are the preferred first-line treatment, but' nephrolithotomy remains an option for large or complex staghorn calculi, particularly in resource-limited settings. This study aimed to determine factors associated with the success rate of open nephrolithotomy at a single tertiary center. 


Methods
This retrospective study included 92 adults who underwent open nephrolithotomy at Wonogiri Regional General Hospital from January 2018 to December 2022. We analyzed demographic, laboratory, stone-related, and operative variables. Stone characteristics were assessed on preoperative non-contrast CT. Success was defined as complete stone clearance or residual fragments <4 mm on plain abdominal radiography (Blaas Nieren Overzicht, BNO) (KUB) on postoperative day 1. Associations were tested with simple binary logistic regression. Variables with p<0.25 were entered in a multiple logistic regression model. 


Results
Among the 92 patients, 59 were men and 33 were women, with a mean age of 53.25 ± 10.25 years. Surgery succeeded in 69 patients (75.0%), and complications occurred in 14 (15.2%). In simple logistic regression, female gender (OR 3.44, 95% CI 1.06–11.20; p=0.040) and multiple stones (OR 0.026, 95% CI 0.003–0.203; p=0.001) were associated with success. In multiple logistic regression, only stone number remained independently associated with success (aOR 0.029, 95% CI 0.004–0.230; p=0.001).


Conclusion
Stone number was the only independent factor associated with the success of open nephrolithotomy. Patients with multiple stones had lower odds of success. This should guide preoperative planning and counseling.

Article Details

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Evaluation of factors affecting success rate of open nephrolithotomy in adult patients. (2026). Universa Medicina, 45(3), 374-381. https://doi.org/10.18051/UnivMed.2026.v45.374-381

References

1.Atmoko W, Savira M, Fajriani R, et al. Stone recurrence among Indonesian kidney stone formers: a comprehensive analysis of genetic polymorphism, demographic, and clinical factors. Med J Indones 2024;33:190-7. doi:10.13181/mji.oa.247596.

2.Ali MW, Azmi YA, Tarmono, Soebadi DM. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in older and younger patients at a tertiary hospital in Surabaya, Indonesia. Folia Medica Indones 2023;59:26–31. doi:10.20473/fmi.v59i1.40968.

3.Tae BS, Balpukov U, Cho SY, Jeong CW. Eleven-year cumulative incidence and estimated lifetime prevalence of urolithiasis in Korea: a national health insurance service-national sample cohort based study. J Korean Med Sci 2018;33:e13. doi:10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e13.

4.Dhondup T, Kittanamongkolchai W, Vaughan LE, et al. Risk of ESRD and mortality in kidney and bladder stone formers. Am J Kidney Dis 2018 ;72:790-7. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.06.012.

5.Kim SY, Bang WJ, Min C, Choi HG. Association of nephrolithiasis with the risk of cardiovascular diseases: a longitudinal follow-up study using a national health screening cohort. BMJ Open 2020;10: e040034. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040034.

6.Yang F, Liao M, Wang P, Yang Z, Liu Y. The cost-effectiveness of kidney replacement therapy modalities: a systematic review of full economic evaluations. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2021;19:163-80. doi:10.1007/s40258-020-00614-4.

7.Chung DY, Kang DH, Cho KS, et al. Comparison of stone-free rates following shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. PloS One 2019;14:e0211316. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0211316.

8.Nourian SMA, Bahrami M. Open surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of staghorn calculi. Am J Clin Exp Urol 2022;10:271–6.

9.Hyodo T, Hirawa N, Kuragano T, et al. The present status of dialysis patients in Asian countries as of 2022 from a medical economic point of view. Ren Replace Ther 2025;11:3. doi:10.1186/s41100-024-00597-1.

10.Afiatin, Khoe LC, Kristin E, et al. Economic evaluation of policy options for dialysis in end-stage renal disease patients under the universal health coverage in Indonesia. PLoS One 2017;12:1-10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177436.

11.Yılmaz S, Topcuoğlu M, Demirel F. Evaluation of factors affecting success rate in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a five-year experience. J Urol Surg 2023;10:245–52. doi:10.4274/jus.galenos.2023.2022.0068.

12.Aydemir H, Budak S, Kumsar Ş, Köse O, Sağlam HS, Adsan Ö. Efficacy of surgical techniques and factors affecting residual stone rate in the treatment of kidney stones. Urol Res Pract 2019;40:144–9. doi:10.5152/tud.2014.40360.

13.Haberal HB, Gudeloglu A, Deger M, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in young-old, old-old, and oldest-old patients: a multicenter study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2021;31:796–802. doi:10.1089/lap.2020.0537.

14.Ali M, Naeem Q, Zafar U, et al. Outcomes and complications of; ercutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a single-center experience. Cureus 2024;16:e69567. doi:10.7759/cureus.69567.

15.Ullah S, Ali S, Karimi S, et al. Frequency of blood transfusion in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Cureus 2020;12:e11086. doi:10.7759/cureus.11086.

16.Singh DK, Gupta S, Shubham K, Kumar N, Tiwari R. Assessment of pre-operative factors associated with blood loss in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective study. Cureus 2024;16:e53739. doi:10.7759/cureus.53739.

17.Bozkurt IH, Aydogdu O, Yonguc T, et al. Predictive value of leukocytosis for infectious complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 2015;86:25–9. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2015.04.026.

18.Yucel C, Ozbilen MH, Bildirici C, et al. Effects of hydronephrosis on the surgical outcomes of fluoroscopically guided supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int Urol Nephrol 2024;56:2555–63. doi:10.1007/s11255-024-03969-y.

19.Hoa TQ, Nguyet TTM, Van Anh NT, Linh LT, Duc NM, Au HD. Evaluation of factors influenced on the effectiveness of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Med Arch 2024;78:33–8. doi:10.5455/medarh.2024.78.33-38.

20.Dagrosa L, Moses R, Pais VM. Incidence and implications of silent hydronephrosis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Clin Nephrol 2017;87:29–32. doi:10.5414/CN108926.

21.Jabrayilov H, Koparal MY, Gürocak S, Küpeli B, Tan MÖ. Factors affecting the success rate of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in paediatric patients. J Clin Med 2018;7:43. doi:10.3390/jcm7030043.

22.Kumar U, Tomar V, Yadav SS, et al. STONE score versus Guy’s Stone Score - prospective comparative evaluation for success rate and complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Ann 2018;10:76–81. doi:10.4103/UA.UA_119_17.

Atmoko W, Birowo P, Rasyid N. Factors affecting stone free rate of primary percutaneous nephrolithotomy on staghorn calculi: a single center experience of 15 years. F1000Res 2016;5:2106. doi:10.12688/f1000research.9509.2.