ISSN 2407-2230 | E-ISSN 1907-3062 | Universa Medicina content is searchable on DOAJ, Google Scholar, and OAI

Imaging of common bile duct stones

A Nurman A Nurman
Submission date: Friday, 26 February 2016
Published date: Friday, 26 February 2016
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18051/UnivMed.2009.v28.59-68

Abstract


The gallbladder serves as the repository for bile produced in the liver. However, bile within the gallbladder may become supersaturated with cholesterol, leading to crystal precipitation and subsequent gallstone formation. Gallstone is one of the most common gastrointestinal diseases in clinical practice. Common bile duct stone may be silent and symptomless; alternatively the stone can cause acute cholangitis with jaundice, pain and fever and acute pancreatitis. Imaging of the gallbladder is typically requested for evaluation of right upper quadrant pain in patients with or without fever and jaundice. Hence,imaging is central to the investigation and diagnoses of choledocholithiasis. There are many options in the field of imaging of choledocholithiasis from a simple to more sophisticated examinations. Ultrasonography (US) has been the traditional modality for evaluating gallbladder disease, primarily owing to its high sensitivity and specificity for both stone disease and gallbladder inflammation. However, US is limited by patient body habitus, with degradation of image quality and anatomic detail in obese individuals. With the advent of faster and more efficient imaging techniques, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has assumed an increasing role as an adjunct modality for gallbladder imaging. MR imaging allows simultaneous anatomic and physiologic assessment of the gallbladder and biliary tract. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography is excellent for identifying the presence and the level of biliary obstruction. With newer diagnostic imaging technologies emerging, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is evolving into a predominantly therapeutic procedure.

Keywords


Bile duct stone; ultrasound; cholangiography; magnetic resonance imaging

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dandan IS, Soweid AM, Abiad F. Choledocholithiasis: overview. eMedicine Gastroenterology; 2008. Available at: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/172216-overview. Accessed November 8, 2008.

Catalana OA, Sahani DV, Kalva SP, Cushing MS, Hahn PF, Brown JJ, et al. MR imaging of the gallbladder: a pictorial essay. Radio Graphics 2008; 28:135–55.

Yeh BM, Breiman RS, Taouli B. Biliary tract depiction in living potential liver donors: comparison of conventional MR, mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced excretory MR, and multi-detector row CT cholangiography-initial experience. Radiology 2004;230:645–1.

Turner MA, Fulcher AS. The cystic duct: normal anatomy and disease processes. Radio Graphics 2001;21:3–22.

Eisen GM, Dominitz JA, Faigel DO, Goldstein JL, Kalloo AN, Petersen BT, et al. An annotated algorithm for the evaluation of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;53:864–66.

Sherlock S, Dooley J. Gallstones and inflammatory gallbladder diseases. In: Sherlock S, Dooley J, editors. Diseases of the liver and biliary system. 11th ed. Malden, Mass: Blackwell; 2002.p.597–628.

Gupta K, Bhandari RK, Chander R. Comparative study of plain film abdomen and ultrasound in non-traumatic acute abdomen. Int J Radiol Imaging 2005;15:109-15.

Fowley WD, Quiroz FA. The role of sonography in imaging of the biliary tract. Ultrasound Q 2007; 23:123-5.

Stroszcynski C, Hunerbein M. Malignant biliary obstruction: value of imaging findings. Abdom Imaging 2005;30:314-23.

Khalid TR, Casillas VJ, Montalvo BM, Centeno R, Levi JU. Using MR cholangiopancreatographyto evaluate iatrogenic bile duct injury. Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:1347–52.

Rosch T, Lorenz R, Suchy R. Colonic endoscopic ultrasonography: first results of a new technique. Gastrointest Endosc 1990;36:382-6.

Yoshitsugu K, Makoto T, Shin Y, Nobuyuki S, Massaki S, Shoichiroh T, et al. Diagnosis of common bile duct calculi with intraductal ultrasonography during endoscopic biliary cannulation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002;17:708-12.

Kohut M, Nowakowska-Dulawa E, Marek T, Kaczor R, Nowak A. Accuracy of linear endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of patients with suspected common bile duct stones. Endoscopy 2002;34:299–303.

Buscarini E, Tansini P, Vallisa D, Zambelli A, Buscarini L. EUS for suspected choledocholithiasis: do benefits outweigh costs? A prospective, controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57: 510–8.

Venneman NG, Renooij W, Rehfeld JF, Vanberge-Henegouwen GP. Small gallstones, preserved gallbladder motility, and fast crystallization are associated with pancreatitis. Hepatology 2005;41: 738–6.

Tandon M, Topazian M. Endoscopic ultrasound in idiopathic acute pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol 2001; 96:705-9.

Frossard JL, Soca-Valencia, Amouyal G, Marty O, Hadenque A, Aouyal J. Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography in patients with “idiopathic” acute pancreatitis. Am J Med 2000;109:196-200.

Liddell RM, Baron RL, Ekstrom JE. Normal intrahepatic bile duct: CT depiction. Radiology 1990;176:633-5.

Schulte SJ, Baron RL, Teefy SA. CT of the extrahepatic bile ducts: wall thickness and contrast enhancement in normal and abnormal ducts. Am J Roentonolog 1990;154:79-85.

Baron RL. Common bile duct stones: reassessment of criteria for CT diagnoses. Radiology 1987;162: 419-24.

Upadhyaya V, Upadhyaya DN, Ansari MA, Shilka VK. Comparative assessment of imaging modalities in biliary obstruction. In J Radiol Imag 2006;16: 577-82.

Knowlton JQ, TaylorAJ, Reichelderfer M, Stang J. Imaging of biliary tract inflammation: an update. Am J Roentonolog 2008;190:984–92.

Soto JA, Alvarez O, Múnera F, Velez SM, Valencia J, Ramírez N. Diagnosing bile duct stones: comparison of unenhanced helical CT, oral contrast–enhanced CT cholangiography, and MR cholangiography. Am J Roentgenol 2000;175: 1127–34.

Puspok A. Biliary therapy: are we ready for EUS-guidance? Minerva Med 2007;98:379-84.

Topal B, Van de Moortel M, Fieuws S, Vanbeckevoort D. The value of magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography in predicting common bile duct stones in patients with gall stones diseases. Br J Surg 2003;90:42-7.

Karani J. The biliary tract. In: Sutton D, editor. Texbook of radiology imaging vol.I. London: Churchill Livingstone;2003.p.711-36.

Massarweh NN, Flum DR. Role of intraoperative cholangiography in avoiding bile duct injury. J Am Coll Surg 2007;10:656-64.

McFarlane MEC, Thomas CAL, McCartney T. Selective operative cholangiography in the performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int J Clin Pract 2005;59:1301-3.

Wallner WK, Schumacher KA, Weidemaier W, Friedrich JM. Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with magnetic resonance cholangio pancreatography with a T2-weighted contrast-enhanced fast sequence. Radiology 1991;18: 805-8.

McEneaney P, Mitchell MT, McDermoth R. Update on magnetic resonance cholangio pancreatography. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 2002;31:731-46.

Calco MM, Bufanda L, Calderon A, Heras I, Cabriada JL, Bernal A, et al. Role of magnetic resonance cholangio pancreatography in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. Mayo Clin Proc 2002;77:422-8.

Romagnuolo J, Bardon M, Rahme E, Joseph L, Reinhold C, Barkun AN. Magnetic resonance cholangio pancreatography: a meta analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease. Ann Inter Med 2003;139-7:547-57.

Williams EJ, Green J, Beckingham I, Park R, Martin D, Lombard M. Guidelines of the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut 2008;57: 1004-21.

Shanmugan V, Beattie GC, Jule SR, Reid W, Loudon MA. Is Magnetic Resonance Cholangio Pancreatography the new gold standard in biliary imaging? Br J Radiol 2005;78:888-93.

Gore RM, Yaghmai V, Newmark GM, Berlin JW, Miller FH. Imaging benign and malignant disease of the gallbladder. Radiol Clin North Am 2002;40: 1307–23.

Neugebauer E, Sauerland S, Fingerhut A. European Association Endoscopic Surgery guidelines for endoscopic surgery. Berlin: Springer;2006.

Leung J. Fundamentals in ERCP in advanced digestive endoscopy: endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography. In: Cotton PB, Leung J, editors. 1st ed. Massachusets: Blackwell Publishing;2006.p.17-80.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Universa Medicina



Creative Commons License
Universa Medicina by Faculty of Medicine, Trisakti University is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://univmed.org/ejurnal/index.php/medicina/