Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: practical experience in 30 subjects

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Dec 26, 2008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18051/UnivMed.2008.v27.150-156 Universa Medicina
Abstract Viewed: 294
PDF Downloaded: 87
Keywords:
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography biliary pancreatic

Main Article Content

A Nurman
Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty, Trisakti University

Abstract

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a noninvasive method of imaging the biliary and pancreatic ducts. No special patient preparation is    required but the usual contraindications to MR scanning apply. The diagnostic performance of MRCP in most biliary tract diseases is similar to that of more invasive techniques of direct cholangiography such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The objectives of this study were to           investigate the diagnostic efficacy of MRCP in patients with abdominal pain with lesser likelihood of having choledochal stone and to determine whether use of MRCP could eliminate the need for purely diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP). A total of 30 patients with suspected biliopancreatic pathology from several hospital was studied retrospectiely between January 2007 and December 2008 in Jakarta. The sensitivity and specificity of MRCP was 92.59% (95% Confidence Interval, 74.25 - 98.71%) and 66.67% (95% Confidence Interval, 12.53 – 98.23%), respectively. The positive predictive value of MRCP for all biliary pathology was 96.15% (95% Confidence Interval, 78.42 – 99.79%) The negative predictive value of MRCP was 50.00% (95% Confidence Interval, 9.19 – 90.81%). MRCP seems to be effective in diagnosing patients with abdominal pain with lesser likelihood of having choledochal stone.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nurman, A. (2008). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: practical experience in 30 subjects. Universa Medicina, 27(4), 150–156. https://doi.org/10.18051/UnivMed.2008.v27.150-156
Issue
Vol. 27 No. 4 (2008)
Section
Review Article

The journal allows the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the authors to retain publishing rights without restrictions.

References

Mac Eneaney P, Mitchell MT, Mc Dermoth R. Update on magnetic resonance cholagio pancreatography. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 2002; 31: 731-46.

Ballinger PW, Frank ED. Biliary tract and gallbladder. In: Merrill’s atlas at radiographic position and radiologic procedures. Vol. II. Missouri: Mosby; 2003. p. 69-116.

Karani J. The biliary tract. In: Sutton D, editor. Textbook of radiology and imaging. Vol.1. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2003. p. 711-36.

Shanmugam AV, Beattie GC, Yule SR, Reid W, London MA. Is magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography the new goldstandard in biliary imaging ? Br J Radiol 2005; 78: 888-93.

Wallner BK, Schumacher KA, Weidenmaier W, Friedrich JM. Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with a T2-weighted contrast-enhanced fast sequence. Radiology 1991; 18: 805-8.

Mougenel JL, Hudziak H, Ernst O. Evaluation of a new sequence of magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography in thick cut and one shot acquisition. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2000; 24: 888–95.

Gallix BP, Régent D, Bruel JM. Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Abdom Imaging 2001; 26: 21–7.

Topal B, Van de Moortel M, Fieuws S, Vanbeckevoort D. The value of magnetic resonance cholangio pancratography in predicting common bile duct stones in patients with gallstone disease. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 42–7.

Wijaya PM. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancrea- tography for biliary obstruction. 7th Hepatobiliary Surgical Update and Workshop on Therapeutic Endoscopy. Jakarta; 2006.

Barrish MA, Yuccel EK, Ferrucci JT. Magnetic resonance cholangio pancreatography. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 258-64.

Calco MM, Bufanda L, Calderon A, Heras I, Cabriada JL, Bernal A, et al. Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. Mayo Clin Proc 2002; 77: 422-8.

Romagnuolo J, Bardon M, Rahme E, Joseph L, Reinhold C, Barkun AN. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a meta analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease. Ann Inter Med 2003; 139-7: 547-57.

Kaltenhaler E, Vergel YB, Chilcot J, Thomas S, Blakeborough T, Walters SJ, et al. A systemic review and economic evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography compare with diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopan-creatography. Health Technology Assessment; 2004. Availabe at: http://www.hta.ac.uk/exec.summ /summ810.htm. Accessed August 1, 2008.

Leung J. Fundamentals of ERCP, in advanced digestive endoscopy: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. In: Cotton PB, Leung J, editors. 1st Ed. Massachusets: Blackwell Publishing; 2006. p. 17-80.

Georgopulos SK, Schwartz LH, Jarnagin WR, Gerdes H, Breite I, Fong Y, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in malignant pancreaticobiliary obstruction. Arch Surg 1999; 134: 1002-7.

Fulcher AS,Turner MA, Capps GW, Zfass AM, Baker K. Half-Fourier RARE magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects. Radiology 1998; 207: 21-32.

Williams EJ, Green J, Beckingham I, Park R, Martin D, Lombard M. Guidelines of the management of common bile duct stones. GUT 2008; 57: 1004-21.