Macular hole surgery under retrobulbar local anesthesia increases visual acuity

Main Article Content

Gilbert WS Simanjuntak
Golda AM Simanjuntak
Reinne Natali Christine

Abstract

Background

Macular hole surgery can be done under general or local anesthesia, and general anesthesia is still the standard procedure. The objective of this study was to investigate the results of macular hole surgery under local anesthesia.

 

Methods

A retrospective study on medical records of patients who had undergone macular hole surgery under local anesthesia. Funduscopic examination of macular hole had been performed and all other diseases with deterioration of visual acuity eliminated. Surgery was performed under retrobulbar local anesthesia, using 2 ml of 2% lidocaine mixed with 3 ml bupivacaine in one syringe. Vitreous tamponade used 20% sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). Demographic and clinical characteristics, visual acuity before and after surgery, and improvements that occurred were assessed.

 

Results

No significant interruption occurred during surgery. Mean age of the patients was 53.89 ± 13.3 years (22-74 years), with mean duration of symptoms of 48.83 ± 100.51 weeks (1-560 weeks). The patients comprised 20 males (55.6%) and 16 females (44.4 5). There were improvements in visual acuity after surgery in 31 patients (86.1%), the rest (13.9%) had identical or lower visual acuity after surgery. A total of 20 patients (55.6%) had postoperative visual acuity of 6/18 or better. Initial mean preoperative visual acuity was 0.08 ± 0.08 (0.01 - 0.29) and improved after the surgery to 0.38 ± 0.26 (0.00 - 1.00), the improvement being statistically significant (p=0.000).

 

Conclusion

Retrobulbar anesthesia is an effective and safe method in macular hole surgery. Macular hole surgery can be done well under local anesthesia, and visual acuity improved significantly.

Article Details

How to Cite
Simanjuntak, G. W., Simanjuntak, G. A., & Christine, R. N. (2017). Macular hole surgery under retrobulbar local anesthesia increases visual acuity. Universa Medicina, 36(3), 160–165. https://doi.org/10.18051/UnivMed.2017.v36.160-165
Section
Original Articles

References

Johnson WM. Perifoveal vitreous detachment and its macular complication. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2005;103:537-67.

Liu W, Grzybowski A. Current management of traumatic macular hole. J Ophthtalmol 2017;17:1-8.

Seidenari P, Santin G, Milani P, et al. Peribulbar and retrobulbar combined anesthesia for vitreoretinal surgery using ropivacaine. Eur J Ophthalmol 2006;16:295–9.

Chan VM, Loo AVP, Tam BSM, et al. Topical anesthesia in posterior vitrectomy. Retina 2000;20:563–4.

Simanjuntak GWS. Surgical result of pseudophakic retinal detachment in Cikini CCI Hospital-School of Medicine Christian University of Indonesia. J Ophthalmol Indones 2009;7:52-5..

Jairam AP, Kaufmann R, Muysoms F, et al. The feasibility of local anesthesia for the surgical treatment of umbilical hernia: a systematic review of the literature. Hernia 2017;21:223-31.doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1577-z.

Prasad N, Kumar CM, Patil BB, et al. Subjective visual experience during phacoemulsification cataract surgery under sub-Tenon’s block. Eye 2003;17:407-9.

Chu B, Tsang S, Yuen C. A combination of pars plana vitrectomy, inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique and intraocular gas tamponade for macular hole-induced retinal detachment. HKJ Ophthalmol 2016;20:109-13.

Zhou Y, Tong Y, Wang Y, et al. A prospective, randomised, double-masked comparison of local anaesthetic agents for vitrectomy. Br J Ophthalmol 2017;0;1-6. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309780.

Chhabra A, Sinha R. Subramaniam R, et al. Comparison of sub-Tenon's block with i.v. fentanyl for paediatric vitreoretinal surgery. Br J Anaesth 2009;103:739-43.

Ghai B, Ram J, Makkar JK, et al. Subtenon block compared to intravenous fentanyl for perioperative analgesia in pediatric cataract surgery. Anesth Analg 2009;108:1132-8.

Jabbar A, Khurana A, Mohammed A, et al. Local versus general anesthesia in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am J Cardiol 2016;1;118:1712-16.

Quick-Weller J, Konczalla J, Duetzmann S, et al. General anesthesia versus local anesthesia in stereotactic biopsies of brain lesions: a prospective randomized study.World Neurosurg 2017;105:16-20.

Omulecki W, Laudanska-Olszewska I, Synder A. Factors affecting patient cooperation and level of pain perception during phacoemulsification in topical and intracameral anesthesia. Eur J Ophthalmol 2009;19: 977–83.

Mir AH, Shah NF, Din MU, et al. Effectiveness of sodium thiopentone, propofol, and etomidate as an ideal intravenous anesthetic agent for modified electroconvulsive therapy. Saudi J Anaesth 2017 ;11:26-31. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.197339.

Jain RA, Shetty AN, Oak SP, et al. Effect of avoiding neuromuscular blocking agents during maintenance of anaesthesia on recovery characteristics in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial lesions: A randomised controlled study. Indian J Anaesth 2017;61:42-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.198408.

Wadood AC, Dhillon B, Singh J. Inadvertent ocular perforation and intravitreal injection of an anesthetic agent during retrobulbar injection. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:562-5.

Simanjuntak GWS. Surgical Approach for Macular Diseases. Makassar : Pertemuan Ilmiah Tahunan Dokter Spesialis Mata;2008.

Das T, Ackland P, Correia M, et al. Is the 2015 eye care service delivery profile in Southeast Asia closer to universal eye health need! Int Ophthalmol 2017;2: 1-10. doi:10.1007/s10792-017-0481-y

Gupta OP, Benson WE. The risk of fellow eyes in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2005:16:175-8.

Mitry D, Charteris DG, Fleck BW, et al. The epidemiology of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: geographical variation and clinical associations. Br J Ophthalmol 2010;94:678-84.