pISSN 1907-3062 | eISSN 2407-2230 | Universa Medicina content is searchable on DOAJ, Google Scholar, and OAI

Foot orthoses improve kinematic measurement in young women with biomechanical abnormality

Maria Regina Rachmawati, Angela BM Tulaar, Muctarudin Mansyur, Ferial Hadipoetro Idris, Ismail Ismail, Ratna Darjanti Haryadi
Submission date: Monday, 07 December 2015
Published date: Saturday, 07 December 2013
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18051/UnivMed.2013.v32.187-196

Article Metrics

Abstract viewed: 219 times

Abstract


BACKGROUND
Foot pronation causes biomechanical abnormalities in the form of functional leg-length disparity. Foot orthoses are often used in the treatment of abnormal pronation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of foot orthoses on abnormal kinematic chain the differences of pelvic height, step length, and walking distance on walking test in young women with biomechanical abnormality.

METHODS
A randomized double blind controlled clinical trial was conducted on 27 young adult women having abnormal biomechanical abnormalities. By random allocation the subjects were divided into the intervention group (14 subjects) receiving correction of foot pronation using foot orthoses, and the control group (13 subjects) receiving no orthoses. Before and during use of foot orthoses, we determined pelvic height difference (mm), step length difference (cm), and walking distance at maximal walking speed for 15 minutes.

RESULTS
Correction of foot pronation resulted in decreased pelvic height difference from 4.7 ± 2.1 mm to 1.7 ± 1.3 mm (p<0.001) and in a reduction in step length difference, from 4.9 ± 2.9 cm to 2.1 ± 1.5 cm (p=0.002). Walking test distance of the intervention group was 1318.5 ± 46.3 m, as compared with that of the control group of 1233 ± 114.7 m (p = 0.05). Walking distance of the intervention group rose steadily in the second test to 1369.3 ± 27 m, and in the third test to 1382.14 ± 10.5 m (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS
Foot orthoses improved the kinematic chain, resulting in a more symmetrical pelvic height, reduced step length difference, and increased functional walking ability.

Keywords


Foot orthoses; biomechanical disorder; kinematic chain; young women

Full Text:

PDF

References


Knutson GA. Anatomic and functional leg-length inequality: a review and recommendation for clinical decision-making. Part I, Anatomic leg-length inequality: prevalence, magnitude, effects and clinical significance. Chiropr Osteopathy 2005;13:12. doi:10.1186/1746-134013-12.

Keenan AM, Redmond AC, Horton M, Conaghan PG, Tennant A. The foot posture index: rasch analysis of a novel, foot-specific outcome measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88:88-93.

Fattah AM, Hassanin MM, Felembane FA, Nassaane MT. Flat foot among Saudi Arabian army recruits: prevalence and risk factors. East Mediter Health J 2006;12:211-7.

Levinger P, Murley GS, Barton CJ, Cotchett MP, McSweeney SR, Menz HB. A comparison of foot kinematics in people with normal and flat-arched feet using the Oxford foot model. Gait Posture 2010;32:519-23.doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010. 07.013.

Rothbart BA. Relationship of functional leglength discrepancy to abnormal pronation. J Am Pod Med Ass 2006;96:499-504.

Rachmawati MR, Samara D, Tjhin P, Wartono M, Bastian Y. Musculoskeletal pain and posture decrease step length in young adults. Univ Med 2009;28:92-9.

Weiner DK, Sakamoto S, Perera S, Breuer P. Chronic low back pain in older adults: prevalence, reliability, and validity of physical examination findings. J Am Ger Soc 2006;54:11-20.

Nourbakhsh MR, Arab AM. Relationship between mechanical factors and incidence of low back pain. J Orthop Spor Phys Ther 2002;32: 447-60.

Shorten MR. Running shoe design: protection and performance. In: Pedoe DT,editor. Marathon medicine. London; Royal Society of Medicine; 2000.p.159-69.

Bishop M, Fiolkowski P, Conrad B, Brunt D, Horodyski M. Athletic footwear, leg stiffness, and running kinematics. J Athlet Train 2006;41:387­ 92.

Pepper MR, Graves JHF, Yu W, Stanforth PR, Cahill JM, Mahometa M, et al. Validation of a 3-dimensional laser body scanner for assessment of waist and hip circumference. J Am Coll Nutr 2010;29:179-88.

Biodex. Gait trainer 2 application/operation manual. Available at: http://www.biodex.com/ rehab/manuals/950385man.pdf. Accessed December 29, 2010.

Caselli MA. Evaluation and management of leglength discrepancy. Podiatr Manage 2006: 14756.

Murley GS, Menz HB, Landorf KB. Methodology article: a protocol for classifying normal- and flat-arched foot posture for research studies using clinical and radiographic measurements. J Foot Ankle Res 2009;2:1-13.

Murley GS. Do foot orthoses change lower limb muscle activity in flat-arched feet towards a pattern observed in normal-arched feet? Clin Biomech 2010;24:89-98.

Kirby KA. Subtalar joint axis location and rotational equilibrium theory of foot function. J Am Pod Med Assc 2001;91:465-87.

Khamis S, Yizhar Z. Effect of feet hyperpronation on pelvic alignment in a standing position. Gait Posture 2007;25:127-34.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2015 Maria Regina Rachmawati, Angela BM Tulaar, Muctarudin Mansyur, Ferial Hadipoetro Idris, Ismail Ismail, Ratna Darjanti Haryadi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
Universa Medicina by Faculty of Medicine, Trisakti University is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://univmed.org/ejurnal/index.php/medicina/


                Scilit