Manuscript Readines Level (MRL)
Before you submit your manuscript, it is highly recommended for you to pre-evaluate it using the Manuscript Readiness Level (MRL). This instrument helps you get an effective time for the peer-review process.
Pre-Evaluation Criteria |
Strong (Level 1) |
Fair (level 2) |
Poor (level 3) |
Title: Straightforward, informative, and represents the contents of the article. |
5 |
3 |
2 |
Abstract: Concise but at least contain the problem, purpose, method, important findings, and implications of the research. |
10 |
4 |
2 |
Keywords: Searchable by the search engine, truly represents the research intention. Don’t use phrases, only words. 5 to 6 keyword is recommended. |
5 |
3 |
2 |
Introduction: Directing the reader about the importance of the research. Presenting significant problems, a clear state of the art, gap analysis, and novel concepts to fill the gaps. End it with the purpose of the research. |
10 |
4 |
2 |
Literature Review: Demonstrate familiarity with the topic and scholarly context, develop a theoretical framework and methodology for the research, Position the author (s) in relation to other researchers and theorists, and show how the research addresses a gap or contributes to a debate. |
10 |
4 |
2 |
Method: Clear and replicable. Reveals how research objectives are achieved with the appropriate tools, procedures, and stages. |
10 |
4 |
2 |
Results: Presenting experimental or survey data or any other kind of data depending on the type of research. The results are generally presented in clear and readable tables and figures. |
15 |
10 |
5 |
Discussion: Meaningful. A good discussion is written as a dialogue that reveals the progress of the research in comparison to previous research. |
15 |
10 |
2 |
Conclusion: This contains a summary of research results (the most important research finding) related to the objectives written in the introduction. |
10 |
4 |
3 |
References: Accountable, about 80% of the literature is from primary sources (reputable journals) and up to date (last ten years). Use reference management tools. |
10 |
4 |
3 |
Pre-Evaluation |
Strong |
Fair |
Poor |
Criteria |
(Level 1) |
(Level 2) |
(Level 3) |
Total score |
100 |
50 |
25 |
Decision matrix
Score |
Probability |
85-100 |
Most likely to be published with little discussion with Editor/Reviewer |
70-84 |
Possible minor revision (if there are no mistakes in principle) |
50-69 |
Possible major revision |
25-49 |
Most likely to be rejected in the first stage |
Disclaimer: The Manuscript Readiness Level (MRL) above is used by authors as a “tool” to optimize the peer-review process. The decision to accept or reject an article for publication in Universa Medicina is the authority of the Editor based on recommendations from reviewers.